About PatentIQ
Live patent intelligence for patent practitioners and pro se applicants
What is PatentIQ?
PatentIQ is an independent research and analysis tool built on top of the USPTO's public Open Data Portal API. It surfaces live patent prosecution data — office actions, examiner statistics, art unit trends, PTAB outcomes — in a single, structured interface, and adds an AI analysis layer that interprets that data for prosecution strategy.
Real-time data
No stale snapshots
AI-powered analysis
Advanced AI on real rejection text
No affiliation
Independent, unofficial tool
Public records only
35 U.S.C. § 122 published data
Who is this for?
Patent Practitioners
Patent attorneys and registered agents use PatentIQ to accelerate office action response drafting, benchmark examiner behavior before formulating a strategy, and research PTAB precedent for appeal positioning.
  • Instant per-rejection breakdown with reference analysis
  • Examiner allowance rate, interview success rate, difficulty score
  • Art unit disposition patterns before docketing
  • After-final, RCE, and appeal tradeoff comparison
  • PTAB trial outcomes by technology and petitioner
Pro Se Applicants
If you filed a patent application without an attorney, you are a pro se applicant. You have the same right to prosecute your application as any registered practitioner. PatentIQ helps you understand what the USPTO examiner found and what your options are before your response deadline.
  • Plain-language explanation of each rejection type
  • What the examiner cited and whether it actually maps to your claims
  • What you need to amend or argue to move forward
  • Realistic assessment of your prosecution options
  • All from your application number — no downloads needed
Platform Features
OA Intelligence
AI-powered
Paste an application number and get a full breakdown of every rejection in the office action — what the examiner cited, whether the rejection is well-founded or overreached, specific amendment language, and side-by-side prosecution strategy options with realistic allowance probabilities.
Examiner Profile
Live data
Look up any USPTO examiner by name or employee number. See their allowance rate, final rejection rate, RCE rate, interview success rate, art unit, and a composite difficulty score — all computed from their active pending case load.
Art Unit Stats
Live data
Enter an art unit number and see filing volume, allowance and abandonment rates, average pendency, and the active examiner roster with individual stats. Useful before taking on a case or evaluating where your application is headed.
Filing Trends
Analytics
Explore patent filing activity across technology classes and time periods. Identify growing areas of innovation, track competitor filing patterns, and understand how your technology area has evolved over time.
Application Search
Search
Search published patent applications by applicant, inventor, assignee, technology class, filing date, and status. Retrieve prosecution history, current status, and jump directly to OA Intelligence analysis for any application.
PTAB Trials
Search
Research Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings — IPR, PGR, and CBM trials — by patent number, petitioner, or technology area. See institution rates, final decisions, and outcome patterns to assess appeal and validity risk.
Pre-filing Simulation
Research
Before filing, simulate how a patent examiner might search for prior art against a proposed claim. Get a sense of the landscape and identify technical differentiators worth emphasizing in the specification and claims.
Understanding Office Actions — A Guide for Pro Se Applicants
When the USPTO examiner reviews your patent application, they will either allow it or issue an Office Action — a written rejection explaining why the application does not currently meet the requirements for patentability. You have the right to respond. If you respond within the deadline and overcome the rejection, your patent can still be granted. Here is what each type of rejection means and how to approach it.
§101Patent Eligibility
What the examiner is saying
Your invention falls into a category that is not patentable — typically because the examiner considers it an "abstract idea," a law of nature, or a natural phenomenon. This rejection is especially common for software, business methods, and diagnostic inventions.
How to respond
Argue that the claim integrates the abstract idea into a practical application — for example, it improves a specific technical process or produces a concrete technical result. Alternatively, amend the claims to add specific technical language that ties the invention to a real-world improvement.
§102Anticipation
What the examiner is saying
The examiner found a single prior publication or patent that describes every element of your claim. If one reference discloses everything, the claim is "anticipated" and cannot be granted as-is.
How to respond
Review the cited reference carefully — examiners sometimes misread or overextend a source. If the reference genuinely discloses everything, you need to amend your claims to add a feature the reference does not describe. If it does not actually disclose a key element, argue specifically which element is missing and where.
§103Obviousness
What the examiner is saying
No single reference has everything, but the examiner combined two or more references and argued that a person skilled in the field would have combined them to arrive at your invention. This is the most common rejection in patent prosecution.
How to respond
Challenge the combination: Does the examiner have a real reason to combine those specific references, or is the rationale conclusory? Does the combination actually teach your specific claim element? If a genuine gap exists in the references, argue it. If not, amend the claims to add a feature that the combination does not teach.
§112Indefiniteness / Written Description
What the examiner is saying
The examiner says the claims are unclear (indefiniteness) or that your specification does not adequately describe or enable the claimed invention. This is about the clarity and support of your claims, not about prior art.
How to respond
For indefiniteness: amend the claim to use clear, defined language. For written description: point to the specific passage in your specification that supports the claimed feature, or amend the claim to match what the specification actually describes. Adding examples from the spec to the claims is often the cleanest path.
Response deadlines — what you need to know
Non-Final Office Action
You have 3 months to respond at no extra cost. Extensions are available in one-month increments up to 6 months total for a fee. After 6 months, the application goes abandoned.
Final Office Action
You still have 3 months (extendable to 6). Your options narrow: you can file an after-final amendment that places the application in condition for allowance, file a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) to reopen prosecution, or file a Notice of Appeal to the PTAB.
Advisory Action
Issued after the examiner reviews an after-final amendment and finds it insufficient. You are typically running out of time — RCE or appeal is usually the next step.
Data & Technology
USPTO Open Data Portal
All patent application data — office action documents, prosecution history, examiner assignments, PTAB trials — is retrieved in real time from api.uspto.gov, the USPTO's public Open Data Portal API. The same data underlies Patent Center and PAIR.
OA Intelligence AI Layer
Office action text is extracted from the USPTO document archive and passed to an advanced AI model with a structured prompt designed to evaluate rejection soundness, reference mapping accuracy, and prosecution strategy. The model sees the actual claim text and rejection text — not a summary.
No Data Storage
PatentIQ does not store your searches, application numbers, or analysis results on any server. OA Intelligence results are cached locally in your browser for 48 hours to avoid redundant API calls. Clearing your browser cache removes them.
Public Records Only
Under 35 U.S.C. § 122, patent applications are published 18 months after their earliest effective filing date. PatentIQ only accesses published, publicly available records. No unpublished or confidential application data is accessed.
Not legal advice · Not an official USPTO tool
PatentIQ is an independent research tool, not affiliated with the USPTO. Nothing here constitutes legal advice or creates an attorney-client relationship. OA Intelligence analysis is AI-generated from publicly available documents — it can be wrong, and it does not replace the judgment of a registered patent attorney or agent. If your application has significant commercial value or involves complex legal issues, consult a registered practitioner (search at USPTO OED). Full disclaimer →
Questions or feedback? support@patentiq.fyi